- Aikido is like Latin: a dead language. To revive it, first learn its grammar.
- And like Latin, it still exerts power—through law, theology, science.
- Aikido is an art of commitment. Hesitation corrodes.
- Until one is committed, there is hesitancy, the chance to draw back.
- Laughter relaxes the body. Relaxation signals safety. Can one laugh and strike at the same time?
- Excellence is cultivated only in the body. Pressure testing drives the art into the hara. Like mochi, the body must be pounded into form.
- Aikido is the cultivation of excellence. The art is embodied physically- the stuff of soma. It has to be pressure tested and forced deep. Tanren-geiko is the only way I have seen it manifest.
- Tanren-geiko is the forge. Without it, the art dissolves into gesture.
- Because this is a physical art it is embodied physically- the stuff of soma. It has to be pressure tested to become forced deep in the hara – the center of movement. I was told the body had to be molded like mochi pounded into shape. Tanren-geiko is the only way I have seen it manifest.
- The spirit is purified through hard work – misogi – that is the way.
- The importance of seriousness in training cannot be understated. It cannot be spoken or transmitted by words alone.
- Tradition is preserved not only in techniques but in stories. Memory is the hidden technique.
- You are following a tradition and to stay connected to that lineage you have to know the stories. Those collective memories provide your cultural heritage.
- Without a center, an acephalous dojo drifts into haze.
- Inspiration: to breathe into. Aikido now breathes with difficulty.
- I did not train with O-Sensei, but I trained with his son and grandson. Transmission is a chain of bodies, not of books.
- It was not O-Sensei who codified technique. That task fell to Kisshomaru, Saitō, and the post-war uchi-deshi. The war swallowed the rest.
- The wonderful work that Josh Gould is doing with preserving the biographies of the pre- and post-war instructors showcases the depth of instructors who really developed the art.
- To transmit Aikido is also to transmit pedagogy. Yamaguchi, Chiba, Yamada — their vigor is gone.
- I am hyper sensitive to the impending sense of loss in the world of Aikido. I have watched the luminaries of the art dwindle and die.
- My generation failed to inspire. The art offered neither martial competence nor spiritual enlightenment. A poor product, or a poor market?
- Despite her family’s multigenerational ownership of a temple in Japan – Yoko never taught or spoke about the spiritual history of Aikido – she told me years ago she would sit zen only when she was old. Spiritual development was in the art – moving zen.
- To disguise incompetence as spirituality is fraud. Weakness is not a virtue.
- I have a visceral reaction to highlighting spirituality to compensate for the lack of the instructor’s ability – spiritual growth is not a panacea for physical incompetence.
- When the student is ready, the teacher appears. When the student is truly ready, the teacher disappears.
- Tao Te Ching was part of the inspiration for my pursuit of Aikido and as much as I like the sentiment of the quote – and time has taught me it is true – it always seemed to be an excuse. Over the years I have tried multiple pedagogical approaches to transmitting the art. The most honest approach for me is a “coach” because I cannot be a guru – my New England reticence and sardonic mocking of cultism wouldn’t allow it.
- Time teaches that sentiment is not structure.
Aphorisms are not conclusions. They are stepping stones. Each must be tested in practice, hammered into the body, or abandoned.
And of course, I could not resist my own commentary for each.
Just a note to let you know that this gets read.
Thanks. I like this.
LikeLike